Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Edison Park Reconfiguration Conceptual Plan→At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 3, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Supports option two with conditions, but asked the council to preserve existing trees and replace them with large 20–30 foot trees, and to make sure the outdated irrigation system is part of the plan.
City Council/Public Financing Authority — March 3, 2026 · 38:08 →A 66-year-old who plays basketball at Edison Park twice a week urged adoption of either option but wants Phase B built first — for the parking and so he can play on fixed courts while he still can.
City Council/Public Financing Authority — March 3, 2026 · 52:39 →Representing the Edison Park Community Group, asked for option two plus conditions: irrigation, path repairs, staggering construction with Ascon and Magnolia Tank Farm, oil well safety, noise walls, and ADA access.
City Council/Public Financing Authority — March 3, 2026 · 1:03:11 →Supports option two but wants pickleball courts kept with the tennis courts as in option one rather than placed behind the fire station among family sports areas; also wants better trash cans and large replacement trees.
City Council/Public Financing Authority — March 3, 2026 · 1:09:02 →Presented the Edison Park Community Group's letter with 14 conditions and asked the council to incorporate them directly into its approval of option two, also for the future CEQA record.
City Council/Public Financing Authority — March 3, 2026 · 1:12:21 →A 29-year resident who endorsed option two as the reasonable plan that addresses option one's noise concerns, urging the council to bake the community group's conditions into the vote.
City Council/Public Financing Authority — March 3, 2026 · 1:15:34 →